media giant Murdoch acquired [Wall Street Journal". On 26th, April, [Wall Street Journal" introduced [Great New York" to challenge [New York Times". AP reported that Murdoch will grant 30 million dollars for [Great New York" in the following two fiscal years. In the imminent new book [War of Wall Street Journal", the author Sarah Ellison relates what he heard and saw, how capital rapidly and mercilessly changed a time-honored media and destroyed its journalism values. It further exposes that Murdoch had deemed [New York Times" as a potential foe when he took over [Wall Street Journal".You See,
ed hardy
Run the Fashion Trend of London
When the idea of news runs up against the will of capital: Sunshine on the carpet in the meeting room of the WSJ on the 9th floor, managers of all departments were here and the principal of overseas establishment were connected by phone. Protect oakley glasses
on International Family Day The new bureau chief, Marcus Brackley, is ready to claim what the direction of the historic traditional newspaper will be after Murdoch takes charge of the press. Ironically, Marcus Brackley` ascent to the position of chief editor coincided with Murdoch`s 5 billion acquisition of [Wall Street Journal". New owner means new journalism values, but this perplexed convention-minded Brackley. [I`ve spent all my lifetime to achieve what we have today, do I have to listen to Murdoch since then?" Marcus Brackley once said to his friend frankly soon after the deal. But complain is always complain, the will of capital appeared soon. The orientation of report of the WSJ has obviously changed in quite a short time. To WSJ the traditional professional value, before Murdoch take charge, was the supreme and each craft was to be mended by 8.3 editors on average before published. Murdoch hasn`t claimed objections to the long proceeding, but obviously unpleased with it.The Attraction of gucci glasses
You May Not Know
Shortly after the official hosting, The signs of the traditional analysis of a long article of "The Wall Street Journal" began to decrease, and were replaced by more short news reports. "Concise" became the new news value. To Brackley, his view of the future direction of development to "The Wall Street Journal,"was the same strain as its predecessor, known as the " The Wall Street Journal" 3.0. That is, the daily breaking news would roll and be updated in the paid news site of "The Wall Street Journal". The further analysis report of the news facts would appear on the next day's newspaper. But for Murdoch, this operation way was clear lengthiness. Murdoch and his think tank called lengthiness of articles as the common problem of American news industry. In his view, the British newspaper knew better the role of first headline on first page. Murdoch want their newspapers to directly communicate to the public with major news events, rather than sit in the office to write voluminous so-called "calm and objective" analysis reports. At the beginning, Brackley was trying to find a balance between the media value of Murdoch and the traditional value of news of WSJ. He stressed to the superior editors that every article needs to defeat the others for the front page.
But even this minor change, it meant the departure from "The Wall Street Journal" news tradition. Brackley would undertake considerable confidence pressure. Sure enough, when Brackley left the meeting room, from the microphone clearly came a mockery of sound of diplomatic editors. Brackley's efforts was not satisfactory. In the next few months, he was always busy rushing somewhere, and he had no time to sit down and discuss a manuscript with editors who had to report to him. It looked like he was occupied too much time by the ideal of keeping "The Wall Street Journal" traditional value, so that he even did not have time to manage this newspaper. He browsed all books related with Murdoch, including the memoirs by chief editors of newspapers that were acquired by Murdoch. He paid extra attention to the part relates how Murdoch changed the tradition of these newspapers. Even has Brackley see countless precedent
