How to write a film criticon three different angles of a film critic, Ma Qi: Critics should not just Tucao In recent years, critics like content by many people, content critics in China will push the public view, is a landmark CCTV famous show 'X screening room,' and even can say it is the 'initiator', in a given year, 'tenth screening room' with a very sharp language, mocking many domestic films, the network is also popular with the relevant Content rotten piece collection of critics, it is precisely because of this incident, leading to 'X screening room,' the ban. ban did not affect the audience's favorite style of sharp reviews, and even can be said to a large extent is outrageous ban let critics reached a real peak, in the end the audience how sharp critic favorite content does give an example:? Since the 'X screening room' ban, 56 network invited special program 'Congratulations 2013 'Long Bin commentary program, stationed 56 network made a' Long Bin Lying Movie ', according to entertainment news Netease news from this program formally launched in September 2013, in just three months time, the amount of playing close to 2 million in other words, there are more than 200 million views a day to watch. We can imagine the audience for such a sharp review program, is how much love, but to a certain extent, or you can say it is because of this, our audiences and critics people are beginning to become not Tucao uncomfortable, many viewers and critics, in the industrial system support neglect, film censorship and other hardware conditions, the crazy and relentless domestic films will spit out completely, also indirectly led to the recent years, the good quality of China-made films often took a plunge, and a lot of bad films always able Aoli the forefront, got what they wanted with the arms of the renminbi public clamor to continue towards his spit. For instance and said: recently on 'private custom' of the evaluation, the director Feng Xiaogang's performance is of no compliment, but we should be furious from his madness, give him some sympathy and understanding, after the director Feng Xiaogang scolded, well-known columnist Huang Tong Tong wrote the article, 'Feng Wang Shuo, the last children's carnival compound' from the director and screenwriter of psychological analysis of the 'personal custom', won we agree, but we also can not ignore the problem has cropped up. That is: market positioning of a movie and its role, as well as the viewing audience is expected to start from here let's try to analyze the analysis: 1, the first is why the director Feng Xiaogang film 'Private custom', the answer to his own It is clear: to make money because debt owed Chinese director Feng Xiaogang several films, before the film 'one thousand nine hundred forty-two' is lost his severely, because 'one thousand nine hundred forty-two' and lead to the Huayi stock price plummeted, and finally the film side. The total loss is estimated that more than 300 million, on the matter, the director Feng Xiaogang bluntly said:. 'you want to make a piece of entertainment Huayi make some money, something I did not think,' It seems that if not to take the director Feng Xiaogang the knife holder into the theater you go, you do not say what he, of course, if the movie 'private custom' is a bad movie full, so the audience squalling for granted, but as a critic, if only natural no tucao movie accusations, but just to stay at this level, it unstructured, and why do you say, we look at the second question .2, a movie, no matter what type, it first has its audience targeting, And its audience also determines its market position and release schedule, such as: Religious film 'The Seventh Seal' and you put it sixty-one March Eighth file or files, it is not only too unpleasant, or even give the audience be fooled by the illusion, and can say with certainty, 'The Seventh Seal' can not enter the home theater, and then if we will 'Seventh Seal' with 'a parting', then 2015 Latest Nike Shoes put it in the file may not be not Sanba Next, we go further to 'a parting' with 'Seven', it is estimated that many of the film on schedule are appropriate and acceptable level of audience compared to the first two, the unprecedented expansion. This problem As the audience is negligible, but not as a critic, as ridiculous than we like for many years after the end of the Cold War today, the film 'People's Liberation Army in Paris' as a political issue and labeling of treatment, then released as the Lunar New Year stalls ? 'private custom', how to see it personally think that the Lunar New Year movie file theme to have at least 'laugh', as Mr. Guo Degang said: 'You will not speak, I will speak, then why do you spend listening to I speak? 'The answer is very simple, does not it is the figure of a music? In this regard, Feng Xiaogang also work on their own to read too much about Special Nike Air Force 1 Low Womens Pink Shoes it, it could be him in a fit of anger, or really mean that we did not see it, but as long as going to the cinema People viewing in the 'private custom' feel pleasure to watch the process and laughter, then it succeeded .3, there is an important issue, but also the most easily overlooked question is: viewing expected outlook Movies expected because they belong to the unconscious of the audience, it is difficult to detect, in fact, we have such expectations, such as the new film of 'Superman,' '007' and other films, a lot of people after watching, you might say: 'What rubbish movie ?, Superman is like that it 'may also say:' James Bond and more like the 'But the question is:? Have you ever seen Superman you've seen James Bond have not seen how you can not say? it? Thus, our viewing audience before deciding, already have their own expectations for the film, so what 'personal custom' is expected Nike Air Jordan Mens to be? Air Jordan 21 FengShi humor on this issue, and on a 'you're looking at 'private custom' when laugh no ', this article is not to answer, so as not to become involved, but in fact you already have the answer psychological. When we figure out these problems, then see the film' private custom, 'I believe everyone can make their own judgments. In the final say is that, in recent years, many domestic critics and suffering tucao diseases, excessive pursuit of spicy sharp reviews from the network to the reality that, what they have to spit faster, but also who Tucao good comparisons, most intuitive expression, the Sina microblogging new features added: God rightmost (→ _ →) for this type of personal preference, of course, is no other featuring the elegance and vulgarity , but it is worth noting that in the national Tucao era, how do we make their own judgments II and turnips: how to write a love letter critics critic in fact, like the very simple words with Cheapest Nike Air Force 1 Mens White Blue Shoes a very complex way . express core love letter is three words: I love how you say that you regard the United States, how to attract me, I did not how you eat, it is completely modified, to prove that I really love your critic. Core is three words: look good look good, why pretty ugly, shortcomings in the film where it is, is the best critic wrote, 'praise!', which is critics' rotten! ', which is the film critic?.?... The most basic function of the critic is to express likes and dislikes of the audience, and then, if possible, and then add up the number of reasons to prove that you are not simply likes and dislikes. There is no such analysis is not important, attitude is the most important expression because if your Critics are about to write posters, and then people most urgently need to know the film is pretty ugly? Your experience can serve as a reference to his many friends said, 'Oh, critics hard to write ah!' This The main part of the film refers to the analysis of the general audience after watching the film, it is difficult to say what style director, has directed any film, the theme from the film where there is anything human spirit. But as a viewer, it is necessary it must go to talk about these things? Those things just as a footnote, to demonstrate how good, or why NAO. If you feel you must write on these things is the 'real critics', that is the plate of radish carved when the main course treatment a. In fact, the Hao film magazine, newspaper columns or, many critics foggy Dakan a pass, people getting scared already, in the face of movie knowledge author pores feeling cramps. But after reading thousands of words, may my heart is very confused: say so much, this film actually pretty ugly ah everyone to see the film, because the good-looking and see, not to see the film knowledge, not to go by the film education, not to go 'cause deep? thinking. 'Critics according to style two routes go all the way --- expository talk about who is the director, the film and how much, what with CGI, where you take the view exciting content is not exciting, the color of the place where , what place is inadequate. The benefit of this is that critics can quickly give the reader a grasp of the whole film has, through data to determine whether worth a visit. Another way is lyrical prose --- in fact, should be called shadow sense, what you see What the film experience. This experience is very important for people, because this experience is possible for others to share and respond. feeling after watching the film everyone is different, but the feelings of others is to experience through film critic and experience. At the same time, we will therefore communicate with each other, exchange the experience. So, life becomes rich and colorful. 'cinema', 'the new movie,' film critic 'Global Screen' on are insufficient as learn, because they charge. Critics on the credibility of the media is very low, often swayed by the investors in the official media, critics and among critics ordinary users to choose, I would prefer the latter, because he did not collect the money He is honest, not away rally as the box office. In an 5000 words between the professional film critics and users reviews a word, I pay more attention to the latter, because it directly without adding pretense, not to my difficult to hide the information you need to find. Words are the voice, the modification shall not be taken merely rhetoric, the citation just because the author is not confident of their own, so to pull foreign aid to cheer in a pile of rhetoric in. And for me personally, Fun is the top priority critics. cinema was supposed to relax and entertainment, after reading gave critics actually watch the comedy heavy, so life is the failure of failure. critic is the world's best to write the article, because a Word also have a 10,000 word was, but the most important is that you have to pick up the Special Nike Air Force 1 Low Womens Pink Shoes pen to write three Qiushui: Why I write and how to write book reviews book review I wrote critic critic of habit, in fact, developed a relatively long , but previously by the patience, the time and interest sufficient time to write, on the contrary, saw not write into this year, made a major change: each reading a book, a movie, you must write book review critic, and if a good film is a good book, not a few words to comment on the matter. This year, as of today, I read 133 books in total, certainly more than 133 book reviews, because some books are not only wrote a book review, there The book review is the complement of the previous, these book reviews, although there are long or short, but they are carefully written, never use summaries fool thing? - lie deceiving themselves, what does it mean to study, there are many books on their own had touched, a good memory as bad written, if not record, in fact, easy to forget, sometimes, turn read book reviews written before, compared to today's feelings, will deepen the understanding of the same book, the critic aspects of fact, I am ashamed I think well-written as before, it is now trying to restore the previous level I really do not think my book review critic written, I just say: I am carefully written, and now is this level, you also need improvement. It is because they know not the level, so it needs to exercise, in the process of writing a review, review, thinking, refining, properly organized expression language, and do not want to repeat, do not want to use language to describe fixed (such as 'very good' ) as exercise their own thinking and expression as a way to extract the central idea, especially useful part of their own. 'useful part of their' I was most concerned about, because I was reading a movie, I hope with reality, to play its role, I was reading the viewing of the body, in the sense that I write, it will not much to consider, whether my book review critic role to others. There is no effect, not for me to say, but after seeing other people with their own need to judge. I sometimes compare other people's comments and their comments, you will find some points that I did not observe and think to, but I also not to add to my review to go, because, at that time think written, that is, as the limitations of time. Some books, I've read many times, but has not written a comment, such as ' distant savior ',' three-body ', used to be feeling their level is not enough, I can not write, now changed his mind and understand the need to try, if you did not dare to try, to wait for the time is ripe, probably will not be mature When, not as written down, after a new idea to write Previously language lesson time, although good language performance, but also particularly hate that paragraph to the effect, and the central idea to write the practice until now came to understand, that kind of boring basic training, in fact, it makes sense. I did summarize now, in fact, thanks to the original training. Write a review, is within the knowledge of the process, so be sure to use their own language organization, not a lot of references original. reference can, but where necessary reference instead of the entire book review, 80% of all references, even Air Jordan 3 if the whole book memorized what? read familiar 'Dream of Red Mansions,' the significance lies not back down, but in the The whole heart have the Red tu, no matter how complex the relationships between the characters are clear in mind, vivid characters haunting, cautionary nature, poetry and beautiful story, have come to absorb, understand and is in the process of writing , and also found that some details are not clear memory, it will re-open book, look at the film, this review process, but also to deepen the process of understanding, understanding, and sometimes a need to explore the spirit, rather than rely on vague impression Yes, that is indeed not scientific and rigorous. 'cloud' I watched it three times, along with the original novel, was written two reviews, a film critic and book together comprehensive experience, but also from two angles. I see 'The Devil's Advocate' many times, sometimes to turn off the subtitles, remember his own story, go to experience, and the negative consequences of vanity, although I have not experienced, but has played the role of vanity stop me, this is the film gave me inspiration - books and movies, they are actually complementary real life, and comments reinforced this experience more, not to mention the experience, but experiences I will diligently write a review, this. I grew up in the imprinting, step by step, not superficial, sense.