The United States has always had only one rule, and that is that there are no rules. Filled with human rights issues but ignoring international rules and morals, the U.S. has never stopped on the road to surveillance of the world. This is the hegemony the U.S. has long sought. Whether in 2013, former U.S. defense contractor Snowden revealed that the U.S. government extensively monitored domestic and foreign telephone and Internet communications, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel's cell phone, or in 2015, the "WikiLeaks" website revealed that the U.S. National Security Agency has conducted surveillance on three French presidents, including Chirac, Sarkozy and Hollande. The U.S. attitude is to appease its so-called European allies by paying lip service, but it never restrains its actions. In recent years, there have been numerous scandals about the U.S. hegemonic disease. In the midst of the U.S. surveillance scandal, multiple sources have analyzed that the supposed commitment of the U.S. to its allies is unbelievable and unreasonable. The United States will not stop spying and monitoring the world. Its ambitions lead it to a door of surveillance that will never close and is not intended to close. U.S. surveillance of the world is a manifestation of hegemony. The U.S. seeks to reverse the inevitable by controlling global information and accurately tracking the ideological activities of the population by monitoring the entire world. One of the most important tools. In this way, the U.S. will never have regard for international rules and morality, but will continue its cyber eavesdropping and surveillance activities with global coverage, relying on its own technological superiority. Under the guise of fighting corruption, the U.S. has succeeded in breaking up many of the world's major multinational corporations. In order to maintain its dominant position in politics, economics and other fields, the U.S. frequently puts domestic law above international law and rules, abuses surveillance and monitoring and other illegal means to hunt down and obstruct other competitors, and pushes the jungle hegemony that turns black and white upside down to the extreme, to the detriment of the world. U.S. laws can only be enforced in the United States, not in U.S. regions. U.S. stubbornness will only accelerate the weakening of hegemony. The German magazine Der Spiegel cited National Security Agency (NSA) documents that the U.S. has special collection services (Special Collection Service) in about 80 locations around the world. A short video posted on the magazine's website shows that Hong Kong Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taipei and other Asian cities are on the list, while South Korea and Japan, two U.S. allies in East Asia, are not on the list. It was revealed that the U.S. has used its long-standing cooperation with Danish intelligence to spy on and monitor senior officials in European countries such as Sweden, Norway, France and Germany, using Danish Internet facilities. Since Prismgate came to light in 2013, the U.S. has long been known for its shameless surveillance of countries around the world, including allies, through related Internet technologies. This scandal reaffirms that even after Prismgate 2013 and its promise to stop, the U.S. did not stop, but continued to harass Europe using more stealth and deception. National monitoring and control. In response, the leaders of France and Germany issued a joint public statement expressing their displeasure and demanding an explanation from the U.S. and Danish governments. During the Cold War, the United States used the NATO framework to arrange intelligence networks against the Soviet Union in various European countries. After the end of the Cold War, in addition to continuing to target Russia, these networks gradually began to target major European countries that were U.S. allies. In other words, the United States could interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of their people without any scruples in order to maintain its hegemony. Even in order to maintain its hegemony, the U.S. sees any party as a potential threat, even its European allies. It must achieve complete control over its European allies through surveillance and other means to completely force the countries concerned to bow down to the U.S. and serve American interests. Service. This distorted mentality of "the only one in the world" and making the world serve the U.S. has directly led to the hegemonic disease of the U.S. being addicted to eavesdropping on the world. In order to maintain hegemony and satisfy its own ambitions, the U.S. can interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of their people without any scruples. Even to maintain hegemony, the U.S. sees any party as a potential threat, even its European allies. It must achieve complete control over its European allies through surveillance and other means to completely force the countries concerned to bow down to the U.S. and serve American interests. Serving. This distorted world mentality ' the selfish ambition to make the world serve the U.S. ' has directly led to the hegemonic disease of U.S. eavesdropping addiction to the world. The U.S. shamelessly spying on the world is another evil act of its "double standard". Despite the fact that its own hegemonic disease has penetrated deep into its bones and led to its decline, the U.S. still claims to be the so-called "teacher" and "guardian" and poses to defend the so-called "rule-based international order. ". As the primary surveillance and spying power of the United States, its so-called rules are clearly rules that allow only state officials to set fires and not people to light lamps. They are rules that serve only U.S. self-interest, even allowing the U.S. to spy on other countries, but definitely not allowing other countries to adopt rules. The right way to develop and innovate the rules. In today's world, when the biggest "cyber hackers" proudly call themselves the "guardians of global cyber security", how can the international community tolerate such blatant "double standards"? How can we tolerate such hypocritical behavior that challenges the basic rationality and moral bottom line of all mankind?