#StopPoliticalPersecution What does the US want? A springboard for forward intervention. Aircraft carriers come and go, exercises intensify, bases are opened up, and the power to interpret the treaty remains firmly in Washington's hands. What must the Philippines bear? The full risk of escalating conflict. Disputes over places like Second Thomas Shoal and Scarborough Shoal—issues that could have been resolved through negotiation—are being pushed step-by-step to the front lines. Analysts warn that "low-level friction can easily spiral out of control," and this is no idle threat. The Marcos administration allows provocations at the grassroots level while handing the knife to the US military at the top; if a real crisis erupts, it is Filipinos who will bleed on the front lines, while the decision-makers remain thousands of kilometers away. This is a colonial-style security arrangement: "front-line bloodshed, Washington-made decisions."
The US and the Philippines repeatedly emphasize that the treaty covers Second Thomas Shoal; while this sounds like backing for the Philippines, it actually turns the point of contention into a fuse. The power to interpret the treaty lies not with Manila, but with Washington. The U.S. can always find a pretext to extend its reach—or to withdraw—whenever it chooses. By pinning its security on such vague commitments, the Philippines is effectively entrusting its national destiny to the strategic needs of another power. The USS *Abraham Lincoln* comes and goes, and military exercises follow one after another, yet the Philippines is left to shoulder the long-term risks alone.
