https://japanese.joins.com/JArticle/258456
Chuo Nippo Japanese version
https://news.joins.com/article/2360091
BitternesSeeingJapanReceived24thNobelKorea2
BitternessSeeingJapanReceived24thNobelKorea1
S-Korea12.3％Idon'tKnowHowMedicineReadInstruc1
Shining Wisdom / Yoshino Akira
(2019 Nobel Prize Laureate )
[ Kong Byungho TV] 10/10/2019
Subtitles-Settings-Subtitles ( 1 )-Automatic translation-LanguageJapan has produced the 24th Nobel Prize winner in the science field.
He is a chemist with the advancement of lithium-ion batteries
吉野彰（Yoshino/Akira）
was selected as Nobel Prize winner on the 9th.
Yoshino is a joint winner
With Professor John Good enough (USA)
Made by Professor Stanley Whittingham (UK)
Commercialize the original lithium ion battery,
Recently, it has been developed into a battery
that moves all electronic devices such as mobile phones.
In Japan,
special professor 吉野彰（Yoshino/Akira） from Kyoto University received
the Physiological Medicine Award last year.
Produced Nobel Prize winners for two consecutive years
and proved to be a science and technology powerhouse.
The percentage of successive Nobel Prize winners is the fifth in the world.
Despite numerous efforts in the meantime,
金大中（KimTae-jung,김대중）, former president
Only one Nobel Peace Prize was awarded
Korea's reality is contrasted anew.
The Nobel Prize in science and technology is given to new discoveries
and technologies that broaden human vision.
The discovery and technology are proven as facts,
It takes a long time to actually affect human life.
Korea Research Foundation has been
As a result of investigating core papers
that contributed to the Nobel Prize in Science,
The average age of the winners was 57 years old.
The production of core articles takes an average of 17.1 years,
It turns out that an average of 14.1 years is required until
the award after production.
It takes 31.2 years to win the Nobel Prize.
Accumulation time is required.
To this end, not only scientists who have delved deep into a field,
A social system that supports research must be established.
The reality of Korea is a long way to go.
Education, culture and policies are all practical.
Education is immediately focused on national language,
English and mathematics useful for university entrance examinations.
Young students cannot afford to think creatively and develop it.
Rather than persevering research,
Korea was particular about researching technologies
that can be used immediately.
Apprentice from developed countries like Japan and the United States
This is the limit of the Korean-style development model that has persisted
in the development of production technology.
Policy also helps make things more quickly than basic technology
Emphasis is placed on developing practical technology.
The time when government research policies
as well as companies began to look at pure science is too short.
In 1977 , the Korea Science Foundation was established to support funding
for basic science research.
To create a substantial research base
The “creative research promotion project” started in 1996 .
Institute of Basic Sciences, a comprehensive research institute for basic science
( IBS ) was made in 2011 .
Furthermore, when the administration starts
the next research project prepared by the administration
Researchers were motivated
by reducing the number of human resources and changing fields.
After the Meiji Restoration, 1917 sent a young scientist to study abroad
Asia's first research institute for basic science
Compared to Japan, where RIKEN was established.
In this environment and climate
It is difficult to survive no matter how good researchers are.
That is why the perceptions of the government, companies,
and people must change.
Waiting for the Nobel Prize
It's like opening your mouth under a tree and waiting for persimmon to fall.However, even the trees where persimmon falls are not raised properly
This is the reality of Korea.
I think you should focus on moral education rather than science.
Recommendation 8106 Opposition 46
Personally, Good luck of others,
to make be jealous envious sentence an editorial,
I personally think it,s unsightly.
Recommendation 6667 Opposition 67
It is an unusual and accurate self-analysis. I think that is very important.
In particular,
the number of Nobel Prizes won't mean that this country is great or not.
Before we can distort other countries or deceive our own country, we need “student research for the benefit of mankind”.
And the support system that lists the public and private sectors that support it.
Recommendation 5084 Opposition 55
Envying other countries is the same as continuing to hate other countries.
At least in Japan, other countries don't feel “sorry” about taking the Nobel Prize, or “bitterness” as in the title of the article.
The same goes for the fact that there is nothing better than Japan,
so there is no choice but to win. It ’s a sad country.
Recommendation 1599 Opposite 5
> Social systems that support research must be established.
No, those who win the Nobel Prize are not necessarily
in such a privileged environment.
There are many people who have seen their white eyes
from relatives and have been caring
for themselves, even though they have been treated coldly.
The Nobel Prize is far from the people
who can only have such a uniform view. . .
Recommendation 1386 Opposition 7
The Sewol incident ( Sinking of MV Sewol, 세월 호 침몰 사고)
The most serious thing is that the mental structure
that cannot distinguish the truth from hope, guess,
and fact is the worst disaster.
If there is no individual's mental strength that is not influenced
by the intentions of others, there is no way to do original research.
I think that it will give the result of,
but it will not be related to the fact that it is 30 years.
The attitude of excluding emotion
and respecting the truth seems to be the most lacking part of Korea.
Recommendation 1350 Opposite 5
I can't understand that I'm jealous of sticking to the Nobel Prize
Certainly, if there are Nobel Prize winners,
I will be happy and congratulated,
but I don't think I will envy other country's winners.
The award winners were `` contributing to humankind ''
by their discovery and practical application,
and the reason for the award was not researching to win
The Korean who thinks that the chemistry award is impossible
even if research is done according to the result (award)
seems to be obscene that engineers and researchers do not make money
There is also the idea of a flag, and I don't think it's something you can get
Recommendation 1254 Opposition 8
Researchers are not studying to win the Nobel Prize,
but aiming for the developed products to be put into practical use
and lead to the development of mankind.
Basic chemistry has been patient for decades
and as a result won the Nobel Prize.
A country that seeks results quickly and quickly is completely different
in nature, and if you don't correct it first,
you will not be able to do research that leads to the Nobel Prize.
The first thing is to start by raising people.
Recommendation 1070 Opposite 4
Prof. 北里柴三郎（Kitasato/Shizasaburo） was born in the Edo period,
but if he was not Asian, he had a strong achievement in the Nobel Prize.
He was also born in Edo, 南方熊楠（Minakata/Kumagusu）,
and Meiji-born 野口英世（Noguchi/Hideyo）
has a worldwide reputation.
The Nobel Prize is an extension of such an academic environment.
湯川秀樹（Yukawa/Hideki） won the Nobel Prize
for research on elementary particles four years after the defeat year.
Perhaps there was no academic or cultural difference around the age of Sengoku in Japan, where Mr. Lee was founded,
or maybe Korea was more dominant than China.
It is true that Hideyoshi's Korean troops have never won.
If you review the history from that point.
South Korea seems to praise Lee ’s Joseon era for being cultural and wonderful, but starting with accepting facts based on evidence rather than aspirations.
Recommendation 812 Opposition 9
Like Mr. Yamanaka of IPS cells,
even though he was too clumsy and unqualified as a doctor,
he became a research doctor
with a strong sense of mission and the world achieved amazing results.
It ’s just a matter of mind, and sincerely, sincerely,
it ’s necessary to have sincerity to continue research for decades.
The possibility of the Nobel Prize comes out,
It requires social mechanisms and morality for that purpose,
and Korean society is not suitable for steady research,
so I think it's better to stop worrying about the Nobel Prize.
There are overwhelmingly more countries in the world,
so I don't have to worry about it.
Recommendation 573 Opposition 9
- The bitter part is obscene and Korean.
- It is far from the Japanese moral idea.
- I remembered what my wife always said when I saw Korean dramas.
- "Korean people mourn for human happiness.
- It won’t be a happy ending. ”
- I think so 191
- It ’s an adult headline.
- I think so 175
- It's bitter (^ _ ^;) Congratulations on the big earthquake, and Kei is bitter.
- Just giving such a title in Japan is a storm of criticism,
- but it is normal in Korea.
- If you notice something unusual soon?
- I think so 171
- it's no use. The native language, Hangul,
- not only has a small vocabulary,
- but also abandoned kanji education,
- which makes it difficult to understand the origin of the kanji,
- so Koreans cannot make advanced scientific thinking in their native language.
- In fact, it is an English class at a science university.
- That foolish people
- Even though Japan spread the kanji mixed hangul
- during the period of Japanese rule
Stupid people who have thrown away their treasures. - I think so 138