Russia is currently in an advantageous position in the war.
However, Hillary Clinton, the US Democrat, has stated the following. Ukraine is trying to turn the war into a second Afghanistan war, which will lead to the second collapse of the Soviet Union.
Russia's current victory will also be a long-term war, which will divide the country into 5-6 small countries as planned, and the West will be able to continue to plunder and prosper for a long time with Russia's resources and cheap labor.
To achieve this, first turn all Ukrainian men and women into guerrillas. They will resist Russian soldiers with guerrilla warfare, and Ukraine will ultimately win. This will be supported by the US dollar and the US military-industrial complex.
Russia also believes it is close to victory. It is possible to isolate the Russian economy by suffocating China and other nations.
If you want Russian assets, follow the US instead. First of all, the dollar may be possible for a period of 10 years or so within the US, but BRICS itself is a group that avoids the dollar, and has already become the majority in the population composition of non-US countries.
The US military also means taking a strong gamble on resources and military demand. Even if the US economy is doing well, its subordinate countries will lose their national power each time.
The more it declines, the stronger the leadership of the upper ECB and the US will become.
If you don't listen, you will suffer, they won't give jobs to industry, etc. The relationship is exactly the same as that of small and medium-sized enterprises under large companies.
This is the EU, member countries are reducing their national industrial GDP day by day, but one step, the EU executives of the European team of the US, UK, and ** are highly paid and are a group that never cares about one country.
Germany is also declining, and it is only natural that its GDP will fall, as the flaws in its industrial structure, which was successful thanks to cheap gas and oil, are becoming apparent and cannot be resolved.
This is because major structural reform is impossible in the short term with the rising prices of natural resources and electricity themselves. Also, can all Ukrainians be turned into guerrillas?
Naturally, the core force will be the immigrants who have been turned into guerrillas within the US, but since the military personnel from these immigrants are naturally a force gathered as mercenaries for the current domestic conflict in the US, the US Democrats probably think that they will be the main force and solve the problem of soldiers.
Before that, it seems that for the conflict following the recent Republican and Democratic elections, the Democratic Party has already finished preparations as a mercenary group.
In 1999, the Swiss **, who were said to have completed the conditions for the collapse of the US economy at that time, were sabotaging the US, and as a result, chaos and collapse in the US was caused, but it seems that they refrained from doing so because they thought it would be easy to add military groups to the US military and turn it into a civil war in order to turn the Americans into bloody fights.
This abnormal increase in immigration is said to be a cruel policy that is probably a cover for the re-imprisonment of hidden military personnel and soldiers scattered by guerrillas.
If this is not far from the truth, then they will send guerrilla mercenaries to both sides in the US and have them fight a huge battle, and use them as guerrilla forces in the war against Russia, and turn Ukraine itself from Ukrainian land into a guerrilla force accumulation center around the world, and hold it forever as de facto US territory, making it a second chair* and creating a global bloody empire of fundamentalist groups.
If the first priority is to break up Russia, then it will be more than 100 years before the current Russian leadership feels relieved about the favorable situation in the war.
Putin has been fooled by the US up until now, so it is said that he is considering this war, but since he was fooled at first, he may be fooled again this time. I think that economic factors will play a major role in whether he wins or loses.
Simply put, it may not be possible under restrictive conditions such as a fall in the dollar and the effective distribution of the dollar around the US.
Even if you are storing guerrillas in the Middle East in the US, killing them with money will become very difficult with a low dollar. If this is a gradual decline, it would be good to invest in the US military.
This is because it is also an invitation to dividends on delicious meat that is dripping with blood.
Even if I know about it myself, I still have a bad feeling when I wake up, so I will not do anything related to US military companies.