国際保健規則IHRが大幅改訂？！

国際保健規則IHRが大幅改訂？！

2024-04-24

テーマ：WCH

WCHJapanの100万人署名運動。

ご賛同いただける方は署名と拡散をお願いします

ワールドカウンシルフォーヘルスジャパンの100万人署名運動 – 〜すべての人が健康と幸せを自由に選べる世界に〜wch-japan.kifusuru.net

昨日、ビッグニュースが飛び込んできて大忙しでした。

そのニュースとは･･･

WHOがIHRの修正案を出してきたのです。

動画も是非観て下さい↓

Eighth meeting of the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)The eighth meeting of the WGIHR will be held from 22-26 April 2024. During this session, relevant stakeholders will be invited to deliver their interventions, followed by a draftin…www.who.int

X（旧Twitter）でポスト（tweet）されている方がおられました。

要点はこんな感じ↓

UsForThemUK

@UsforThemUK

Updated IHR Amendments Just Published A HUGE VICTORY FOR NATIONAL DEMOCRACY, FREE SPEECH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A briefing to follow, and link to the text below. Headlines here: Massive climb down from the WHO Working Group on almost ALL substantive concerns that we and others have raised over the past 18 months. The WHO’s recommendations remain non-binding. Article 13A.1 which would have required Member States to follow directives of the WHO as the guiding and coordinating authority for international public health has been dropped entirely. An egregious proposal which would have erased reference to the primacy of “dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” has been dropped. This proposal marked a particularly low water-mark, and should never have been suggested. Provisions that would have allowed the WHO to intervene on the basis of a mere ‘potential’ health emergency have been dropped: a pandemic must now either be happening or likely to happen, but with the safeguard that to activate its IHR powers the WHO must demonstrate that coordinated international action is necessary. Proposals to construct a global censorship and ‘information control’ operation led by the WHO have been dropped. A material dampening of the expansionist ambitions of the WHO: provisions which had proposed to expand the scope of the IHRs to include “all risks with a potential to impact public health” (e.g. climate change, food supply) have been deleted. The scope now remains essentially unchanged, focussed on the spread of disease. Explicit recognition that Member States not the WHO are responsible for implementing these regulations, and bold plans for the WHO to police compliance with all aspects of the IHRs have been materially watered down. Many other provisions have been diluted, including: surveillance mechanisms that would have given the WHO a mandate to find thousands of potential new pandemic signals; provisions which would have encouraged and favoured digital health passports; provisions requiring forced technology transfers and diversion of national resources. The published document is only an interim draft, to be put before the IHR Working Group during this week’s final negotiations, so it could yet change. That said, on the basis of this draft this is a profound victory for people power over unaccountable technocracy. https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr8/WGIHR8_Proposed_Bureau_text-en.pdf…

@WHO

@EstherMcVey1

@camillahmturner

要約すると

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

・WHOの勧告は依然として拘束力を持たない。WHOの指示に従うことを加盟国に義務づける第13A条1項は完全に削除された。

・「尊厳、人権、基本的自由」の優先性に関する言及を消去するというひどい提案が取り下げられた

・WHOが単なる「潜在的な」健康上の緊急事態を根拠に介入することを認める規定は削除された。

・WHO主導による世界的な検閲と「情報統制」作戦を構築するという提案は取り下げられた

・IHRの適用範囲を「公衆衛生に影響を与える可能性のある全てのリスク」（気候変動、食糧供給など）にまで拡大することを提案していた条項が削除された。

・これらの規制を実施する責任はWHOではなく加盟国にあるということが明確に認識され、WHOがIHRのあらゆる側面の遵守を監視するという大胆な計画は大幅に弱められた。

・何千もの潜在的な新たなパンデミックの兆候を見つける権限をWHOに与える監視メカニズムの規定が弱められた。

・デジタル健康パスポートを奨励し好意的に扱う規定が弱められた。

・強制的な技術移転と国家資源の転用を求める規定が弱められた。

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー