1. Japanese people's tendency of subjective observation

Japanese companies rely upon businesses with China. As of 2021, China is Japan's No.1 trade partner both in exports and imports.



Thus, objectively speaking, Japanese companies, if they seek for their own interests, should approach Japanese political parties, urging them to maintain good relations between Japan and China, and ask the Japanese government to withdraw from QUAD, reject Asian NATO and support peaceful reunification between China and Taiwan.

However, tragically, Japanese people have a tendency as a race that they see only a part of the reality, jump to a wrong conclusion and act accordingly, only to find themselves in a big trouble. They always make mistakes in that way.

In Sino-Japanese War of 1937 to 1945, Japan saw only the Kuomintang army and jumped to a wrong conclusion that they could conquer China. They didn't see the valiant military power of the Eighth Route Army (which was renamed the People's Liberation Army in 1947) of the Communist Party of China.


[Eighth Route Army fighting on the Futuyu Great Wall, Laiyuan, Hebei, 1938]

In 1941, Japan saw only existing old US battleships in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and jumped to a wrong conclusion that, if they destroy those battleships by a surprise attack of 6 aircraft carriers, the US would surrender soon. They didn't see enormous US industrial power. At the end of WWII, the US had 200 aircraft carriers while Japan had none.


[Imperial Japanese Navy airplanes fly over a Hawaii naval port during the Pearl Harbor attack]


2. The LDP government's attempt of enacting Taiwan Relations Act and revising the constitution

Now, in 2022, Japan is once again about to start seeing only a part of the reality, jump to a wrong conclusion and plunge into a self-destruction.

In the upper house election of the summer of 2022, the ruling party LDP won a sweeping victory.



Before long the Japan's LDP government and Japanese media would start emphasizing that Taiwan is democratic unlike authoritarian China and that China is trying to invade Taiwan militarily, which Japan must stop by force if necessary.

Japanese people won't be informed of or see the facts that Taiwan is a renegade province of China and that, therefore, Taiwan issue is China's internal affair, intervention of which by the West is a violation of international law.



As a result of that, Japanese people would support the Japanese version of Taiwan Relations Act in which it would be stipulated that Japan is obligated to defend Taiwan.

Also, the Japanese government would start asserting that, in order to defend Taiwan, Japan needs to revise the constitution so that Japan can use its military force in a war against China. The Japanese people, seeing only a part of the reality, would accept and support the revision of the constitution.



In short, Japan would once again see only a part of the facts, jump to a wrong conclusion and fight against China.

Under these circumstances, what must be done is to let Japanese people know the entire picture of the reality in order to prevent a war.


3. CGTN and RT can start Japanese broadcasting

Currently, CGTN (China Global Television Network) and RT (formerly Russia Today) are broadcasting 24/7 English-language programs. They are providing to world viewers critical information missing in the West media's reporting.



However, unfortunately, almost all Japanese people cannot hear and understand English. Therefore, critical information being broadcasted by CGTN and RT cannot reach Japanese people's minds.

Thus, CGTN and RT should start Japanese language broadcasting as soon as possible to present critical facts to Japanese people to prevent a war.

For example, what can be done immediately is that CGTN and RT can use AI translators to translate live English broadcasting into the Japanese language and put the translated texts on screen of 10 minute-delayed broadcasting. Then, Japanese audience can read the translated Japanese texts and understand the contents almost at the same time with live broadcasting.




Also, CGTN can start the Japanese language version of "The World Today" news program with casters who can speak Japanese.

For example, CGTN's reporter Ms. Cao Bing speaks the most excellent and polite Japanese. She can be one of casters for the Japanese version of "The World Today" news program.



Also, there are many Japanese freelance announcers available in Japan who quitted Japanese TV stations. CGTN can employ them as casters for the Japanese version of "The World Today" news program.

Foreign correspondents' reporting can be translated into Japanese and dubbed by Japanese freelance announcers.

As described above, most Japanese people don't know even the basic facts that Taiwan is a renegade province of China and that, therefore, Taiwan issue is China's internal affair, intervention of which by the West is a violation of international law. Thus, the Japanese version of "The World Today" news program can emphasize these facts.

Historical explanation, experts' comments and interviews of foreign scholars can be used to emphasize and vindicate these facts.

Since Japanese people’s listening capacity is so poor even in Japanese, captions of Japanese language should be superimposed on screen as much as possible.

And, in order to facilitate Japanese people's understanding, paper boards can be used by casters, which Japanese TV news programs usually do.


Also, Japanese business people and investors are keen to hear the latest news on Chinese businesses. So, the Japanese version of CGTN's "Global Business" and Japanese translated "Biz talk" can be broadcasted too.






Using facts and data, the Japanese version of CGTN's "Global Business" and Japanese translated "Biz Talk" can impress Japanese business people and investors that China will overwhelm US & EU in 6G/5G race and therefore dominate AI, self-driving cars, IoT and big data businesses, which means that China will dominate financial, manufacturing and service businesses and that Japan should prosper with China.


CGTN can use AI translators to translate English broadcasting into the Japanese language and put the translated texts on screen to broadcast such excellent programs as...


World Insight with Tien Wei...




The Point with Liu Xin...




DIALOGUE...




The Hub with Wang Guan...




and The HEAT.





CGTN can also show ordinary Chinese people's lives and Chinese culture by broadcasting in Japanese such excellent programs as...


Redicovering China...




Inheritors...




Travelogue...




The VIBE



...among others.


Furthermore, CGTN can broadcast in Japanese not only news and information programs but other programs such as TV dramas and movies as well.

For example, "Going Across the Yalu River" which is TV drama series based on the history of the Korean War is so excellent a drama that it will be very much popular among Japanese audience.



Japanese voice actors can be used to dub Chinese dramas and movies.


24 hours a day Japanese broadcasting would be effective as many young Japanese people watch TV programs during midnight and early morning.


Let Japanese people know the entire picture of the reality in order to prevent a war.

Help them to overcome their defective tendency of subjective observation.

Let them "see the difference".


The US and Japanese governments may wrongfully regard it as an information warfare. But, it is not an information warfare but rather China's mercy to try to save millions of Japanese people's lives and tens of thousands of American soldiers' lives that will perish if a war breaks out over Taiwan.

Thank you.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect nor represent the policy or position of any government, party, or organization.

Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. UK and the US may start a less hostile approach to China and Russia but, at the same time, will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.


1. Boris Johnson's resignation and Wang-Blinken talk

In early July, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced to resign because of the revolt of the cabinet members whom he himself appointed.



Boris Johnson was instrumental to expand NATO eastward so that Russia would be provoked. When the Ukraine War broke out, UK was spearheading weapon supply to Ukraine.

However, after 4 months, Russia is now in full control of Luhansk region in Ukraine. Russian ruble is stronger than when the war began. Russian oil & gas revenues are at all-time highs.

Apparently, European rich people and big businesses are not satisfied with the performance of Boris Johnson. So, they mobilized the cabinet members. Boris Johnson was fired.

Currently, the next leader of the Conservative Party who will succeed Boris Johnson as UK Prime Minister is being selected.

Boris Johnson's hardline approach against Sino-Russian alliance has failed. So, UK under a new leader may take a less hostile approach to China and Russia.

But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, UK will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.


On July 10th, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken held talks covering Ukraine war and trade.



Realizing the strength of Sino-Russian alliance
The US too may change their strategy. The US may take a less hostile approach to China. For example. the US may gradually reduce tariffs against Chinese goods under the guise and excuse of the necessity to calm down inflation in the US.

But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, the US will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.


2. "Divide and rule" is US & UK's maxim

Looking back the era of the Cold War, one of the decisive factors that enabled the West to win the Cold War was that they succeeded in severing China from the Soviet Union.

In 1969, the Soviet Union and China had a border dispute. The seven-month military conflict between the Soviet Union and China resulted in the Sino-Soviet split.



After that, US President Richard Nixon visited China in 1972. The US approached China and succeeded in establishing friendly relations with China.



On the other hand, the Soviet Union started a war in Afghanistan in 1979. The US supplied weapons to Afghan guerillas to make the Soviet Union into a military quagmire, which led to the beginning of decline and collapse of the Soviet Union.



Thus, it is likely that the US and UK will try to do the same thing, doing everything to sever China from Russia.

The US and UK may keep existing hostile policies against Russia. But, the US and UK may take a lenient approach toward China so that the differentiated approach would cause a crack between China and Russia.

"Divide and rule (divide et impera)" is the Roman maxim that the US and UK has repeatedly been using.

Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.


Also, the US and UK will try to find and intensify a difference within the Communist Party of China (CPC) so that the CPC would have a intraparty conflict.

Back in 1980s, Japanese economy grew rapidly and threatened the US economic dominance. In those days, Japan's strength stemmed from the unity of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the bureaucrats and industries.

Thus, the US decided to divide the LDP which has been a ruling party in Japan for decades. The large number of LDP members of the parliament left the party and formed several new parties.







Finally, opposition parties merged into the Democratic Party (DPJ) and, in 2009, a change of the government happened. Under the new DPJ government, the power and privileges of bureaucrats were deprived.



Without the protection of the LDP and the bureaucrats, Japanese industries lost their edge. Some companies went bankrupted. Some companies were taken over by US companies. Japan went into a long depression.

US strategy of "Divide and rule" against Japan worked.


The US would try to do the same thing toward China.

For example, the US may try to find and intensify a difference within CPC such as between a market-oriented-faction and a state-oriented-faction.

China should maintain and solidify the unity of CPC because that is the fundamental source of power of China.


Furthermore, the US would try to sever the unity between the CPC and Chinese people.

The CPC should solidify the unity with Chinese people.


3. Cooperation solidifies Sino-Russian alliance and BRICS plus's unity

In order to solidify the unity, Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus, should continue offensive operations toward the West.




In late June, Argentina and Iran applied for BRICS membership.

So, BRICS plus can support Argentina's sovereignty claim over Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) where UK maintain its colony.



Also, BRICS plus can support Maldives' claim over Diego Garcia where UK provides an area for a US military base.


Iran proposed a new currency to be used among BRICS plus, which will undermine the US Dollar dominance.


Nicaragua has authorized Russian troops, planes and ships to deploy to Nicaragua for the purposes of training, law enforcement or emergency response.

China may obtain the same authorization from Nicaragua.



Russian warships can stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Caribbean Sea. Chinese warships may stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Pacific Ocean.

Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus can solidify the unity through cooperating in diplomacy, military and economy, which will firmly establish the multipolar world and serve the benefit of the mankind.

Thank you.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect nor represent the policy or position of any government, party, or organization.

What if DPRK unilaterally declares it will protect Russia and China to defend the multipolar world?

What if DPRK declares it will attack any country that attacks Russia or China, whether it is the US or EU or Australia or Japan, using Hwasong-17 ballistic missiles with EMP (electromagnetic pulse) warheads?






1. It is the Multipolar World

The age of the US Unipolar World is over. It is the age of the Multipolar World.

Russia has deployed hypersonic weapons and developed Sarmat ballistic missiles, against which the US has no defense.

China is implementing Belt and Road Initiative to make countries along the 21st century silkroad prosperous, thereby lifting 7.6 million people from extreme poverty and 32 million people from moderate poverty from 2015 to 2030.



BRICS has total 3.3 billion population while G7 has only 777 million.



BRICS plus is admitting new members of Iran and Argentina and introducing new currency initiative to overthrow US dollar dominance.

Shanghai Cooperation Organization is a multinational security organization which includes China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.



It is already the multipolar world. The US and EU should admit it. However, the West is trying to maintain their hegemony by expanding NATO eastward to threaten Russia and formulate Asian NATO to contain China militarily. They try to maintain the US Unipolar World.


2. DPRK's Declaration to Defend the Multipolar World

Under these circumstances, DPRK (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea - North Korea) may declare unilaterally that it will protect Russia and China to defend the multipolar world.

DPRK can declare that it will attack any country that attacks Russia or China, whether it is the US or EU or Australia or Japan.

So far, DPRK has developed ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons only for the purpose of defending itself. But, DPRK may enhance its national objectives to the higher level of defending not only itself but the multipolar world, and defending BRICS plus from the West's hegemony. DPRK can be a kind of voluntary guardian of the just cause.

In addition, DPRK may say that it was saved by Russia and China in Korean War in which 114,000 China's soldiers died.

After all, if Russia or China is attacked, DPRK's security is jeopardized too. It has a shared future and destiny with Russia and China.


3. DPRK's EMP Attack

Actually, DPRK already has military power to completely destroy and annihilate the US, UK and EU.

DPRK can attack the US, UK and EU by EMP attack.


[North Korea released photos of leader Kim Jong Un inspecting a nuclear bomb that could be used for an electromagnetic pulse attack]


[HNEMP (High Altitude Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse)]

A nuclear electromagnetic pulse (commonly abbreviated as nuclear EMP, or NEMP) is a burst of electromagnetic radiation created by a nuclear explosion.







DPRK already has intercontinental ballistic missiles that can detonate nuclear bombs hundreds kilometers above the mainland U.S.

EMP attack would not kill people but destroy electric grids, cellular phones, PCs, and almost everything that has electronic circuits.

According to the US congressional testimony by Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, the Executive Director of Task Force on National and Homeland Security, such detonation would generate electromagnetic pulse that would blacks-out the electric grid for a year and decimate the critical infrastructure necessary to support a large population. In one year, up to 90% of the US population could perish from starvation, disease and societal collapse. [1]


The US and Europe are well within the range of Hwasong-17 which has a range of as long as 15,000 km. DPRK can destroy the US and Europe anytime by EMP attack.







DPRK is resilient too. Its mobile ballistic missiles are hidden in deep tunnels in the mountainous areas. Even if attacked by nuclear weapons, DPRK's missiles will survive and carry out counter-attack.


Lithuania has blocked Russia's railway transportation to Kaliningrad to protect EU nations.

DPRK can declare that it will protect Russia and China to defend the multipolar world. It can declare that it will attack any country that attacks Russia or China, whether it is the US or EU or Australia or Japan. DPRK can say it can attack by Hwasong-17 ballistic missiles with EMP warheads.


4. Russia and China’s Veto on Sanctions against DPRK

DPRK has already been heavily sanctioned for decades. It has nothing to fear.

Actually, China and Russia vetoed sanctions against DPRK at the UN Security Council on May 26, regarding DPRK's ballistic missile launches.



The West’s attempt to impose additional sanctions to DPRK will continue to be vetoed by Russia and China.

Incidentally, as it is DPRK's unilateral declaration, Russia and China themselves are not liable and therefore immune from sanctions.


Failing imposing sanctions against DPRK, the West would demand Russia and China to persuade DPRK to abandon the declaration.

In reply, Russia and China can say they may persuade DPRK to rescind its declaration, on condition that buffer zones will be established in Europe and Asia. In Europe, former Warsaw Pact nations can be neutral states to form a buffer zone. In Asia, Japan and South Korea can be neutral states to form a buffer zone.


On June 2nd, China’s fighter jet repelled a Canadian reconnaissance plane near DPRK.

Russia and China may supply defensive weapons to DPRK. For example, Russia may supply S-400 air-defense systems to DPRK.


Thank you.


Reference:
[1] "North Korean EMP Attack Would Cause Mass U.S. Starvation, Says Congressional Report", October 23rd 2017, Forbes


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect nor represent the policy or position of any government, party, or organization.